<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do you think?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tienchiu.com/2009/10/what-do-you-think-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tienchiu.com/2009/10/what-do-you-think-2/</link>
	<description>The Traveling Tiger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:01:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Margo</title>
		<link>http://www.tienchiu.com/2009/10/what-do-you-think-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>Margo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tienchiu.com/?p=4543#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>I agree with the word, &quot;Explorer&quot; instead of  &quot;World Traveler, More&quot;.   Shorter and covers it all.  Makes one curious to see what you are about.  Thanks for sharing your adventures with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the word, &#8220;Explorer&#8221; instead of  &#8220;World Traveler, More&#8221;.   Shorter and covers it all.  Makes one curious to see what you are about.  Thanks for sharing your adventures with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walden</title>
		<link>http://www.tienchiu.com/2009/10/what-do-you-think-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1213</link>
		<dc:creator>Walden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tienchiu.com/?p=4543#comment-1213</guid>
		<description>I like the second one, with the subtitle.  More explanation, less presumptuous.   I think that bibliotecaria might be right and you might want to consider the word &quot;explorer&quot; instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the second one, with the subtitle.  More explanation, less presumptuous.   I think that bibliotecaria might be right and you might want to consider the word &#8220;explorer&#8221; instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bibliotecaria</title>
		<link>http://www.tienchiu.com/2009/10/what-do-you-think-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator>bibliotecaria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tienchiu.com/?p=4543#comment-1212</guid>
		<description>I like it with the subtitle, but I think an even better word than &quot;world traveler&quot; would be explorer. You are an deep explorer of many things and many subjects, so somehow that expresses your personality better to me (from the limited view of it that I get).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it with the subtitle, but I think an even better word than &#8220;world traveler&#8221; would be explorer. You are an deep explorer of many things and many subjects, so somehow that expresses your personality better to me (from the limited view of it that I get).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Rude</title>
		<link>http://www.tienchiu.com/2009/10/what-do-you-think-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Rude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tienchiu.com/?p=4543#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>I vote for the second one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for the second one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenadina</title>
		<link>http://www.tienchiu.com/2009/10/what-do-you-think-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenadina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tienchiu.com/?p=4543#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>I like them both. The second one is perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like them both. The second one is perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
